Print Archive
Vol. 97, No. 1 (2024)
The Federal Reserve and the Constitution
Daniel K. Tarullo*
In a number of important cases restricting the authority and independence of federal agencies, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has adopted reasoning that, if applied consistently, could have more far-reaching consequences for the administrative state. To explore the limits of the Court’s evolving doctrines, this Article shows how their application might lead to a conclusion Judging Firearms Evidence
Brandon L. Garrett,* Eric Tucker† & Nicholas Scurich‡
Firearms violence results in hundreds of thousands of criminal investigations each year. To try to identify a culprit, firearms examiners seek to link fired shell casings or bullets from crime scene evidence to a particular firearm. The underlying assumption is that firearms impart unique marks on bullets and cartridge cases, and that trained examiners can Shelby County to Clean Air Act: Evaluating the Constitutionality of California’s Clean Air Act Waiver Under the Equal Sovereignty Principle
Justine Huang*
In August 2022, California promulgated the Advanced Clean Cars II regulation, banning all sales of new gasoline-powered cars in the state by 2035. Transportation is the largest source of air pollution in California, responsible for nearly 40% of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions; thus, the regulation is a crucial step towards meeting the state’s carbon neutrality Restraining the Second Amendment in the Era of the Individual Right: Adopting a Modified South African Gun Control Model
Lukas T. Huldi*
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Supreme Court announced a novel historical test for judging the constitutionality of firearm laws. In combination with its earlier decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court has created an onerous burden on federal and state legislatures Perfecting the Judicial Peremptory Challenge: A New Approach Using Preliminary Data on California Judges in 2021
Sarah Park*
Even the most carefully planned and genius strategies are pointless without an assumption of fairness: chess depends on a fair arbiter, soccer depends on a fair referee, and litigation depends on a fair judge. Just as arbiters and referees are frequently criticized for questionable decisions, judges also deal with accusations that bias has impermissibly clouded | |
Vol. 96, No. 1 (2022)
Fractionalization to Securitization: How the SEC May Regulate the Emerging Assets of NFTs
Lauren Au*
Blockchain technology opened the world to a variety of new technological advances that reshaped the way humans interact and transact with one another. One of the most recent and trending applications of blockchain technology is non-fungible tokens or “NFTs.” NFTs are unique digital tokens encoded on a blockchain that represent ownership of specific digital assets Ditching Daimler and Nixing the Nexus: Ford, Mallory, and the Future of Personal Jurisdiction under the Corporate Consent and Estoppel Framework
Shauli Bar-On*
While personal jurisdiction is intended to assess whether a defendant should be forced to defend a lawsuit in a location due to the defendant’s contacts with that forum, the doctrine has shifted to require the plaintiff to show a connection to the forum, even if the defendant otherwise has substantial contact with it. In its Toward a New Fair Use Standard: Attributive Use and the Closing of Copyright’s Crediting Gap
John Tehranian*
A generation ago, Judge Pierre Leval published Toward a Fair Use Standard and forever changed copyright law. Leval advocated for the primacy of an implicit, but previously underappreciated, factor in the fair use calculus—transformative use. Courts quickly heeded this call, rendering the impact of Leval’s article nothing short of seismic. But for all of its merits, Leval’s The Invention of Antitrust
Herbert Hovenkamp*
The long Progressive Era, from 1900 to 1930, was the Golden Age of antitrust theory, if not of enforcement. During that period courts and Progressive scholars developed nearly all of the tools that we use to this day to assess anticompetitive practices under the federal antitrust laws. In a very real sense, we can say Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover: Doing Away with Separation Requirements for Divorce
Claire P. Donohue*
Despite the evolution of no-fault divorces, which were intended to remove certain barriers to divorce and essentially make any divorce filed inevitable, many jurisdictions prescribe a waiting period before eligibility for divorce, during which there must be a demonstrable period of separation. In support of findings of facts and conclusions of law about whether the | Vol. 96, No. 2 (2023)
Lenity and the Meaning of Statutes
Jeesoo Nam*
Ordinary canons of statutory interpretation try to encode linguistic rules into jurisprudence. Their purpose is to figure out the meaning of a text, and their outcome is to determine the meaning of the text. Both the purpose and the outcome are linguistic. The rule of lenity is not an ordinary canon of statutory interpretation. The Seeing and Serving Students with Substance Use Disorders Through Disability Law
Parker Cragg*
The opioid epidemic has brought the immense harms of substance abuse to the fore of national attention. Despite a growing bipartisan consensus that substance use disorders are best addressed through treatment and community support, rather than punitive deterrence measures, policymakers have yet to allocate the necessary resources for a comprehensive and evidence-based national drug policy. Analyzing the Circuit Split Over CDA Section 230(E)(2): Whether State Protections for the Right of Publicity Should be Barred
Courtney Kim*
INTRODUCTION In 2018, coworkers notified Karen Hepp, a newscaster and co-anchor for the local Fox affiliate’s morning news program Good Day Philadelphia, that a screenshot of her smiling at a hidden security camera taken about fifteen years ago was being used in various online advertisements for erectile dysfunction and dating apps. Hepp was not previously Affirmative Acting: The Role of Law in Casting More Actors With Disabilities (A Note in Five Acts)
Kira Patterson*
SETTING THE STAGE: INTRODUCTION “Always find your light.” This is a common piece of advice given to theater artists, encouraging them to make sure they can be seen on stage. But who gets the chance to grace the stage in the first place? Our society has recently begun to actively ask new questions about Race and Politics: The Problem of Entanglement in Gerrymandering Cases
Stephen Menendian*
Gerrymandering—the manipulation of political districting processes and boundaries for partisan political advantage—has proven a troubling and difficult area of constitutional concern. This is partly due to the exceptionally divergent standards of judicial review applicable depending upon the basis for the gerrymander claim. The Supreme Court has consistently held that racial gerrymanders are subject to strict | |
Vol. 96, No. 3 (2023)
Self-Defense Exceptionalism and the Immunization of Private Violence
Eric Ruben*
After the high-profile trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, the parameters of lawful self-defense are a subject of intense public and scholarly attention. In recent years, most commentary about self-defense has focused on “Stand Your Ground” policies that remove the duty to retreat before using lethal force. But the reaction to Rittenhouse’s case reflects a different, more Suing SPACs
Emily Strauss*
In 2020, the financial world became transfixed by a massive increase in the number of firms going public through special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) transactions. A SPAC is a publicly traded company formed solely for the purpose of raising money from investors and choosing a merger partner, thereby bringing the target company public. SPAC shareholders Co-Creating Equality
Sarah Polcz*
When a creative work has many co-creators, not all of whom contributed equally, how should they split ownership? In the absence of a contract, copyright law has long adopted an all-or-nothing answer to this question: if you are deemed to be a “co-author” you get an equal split; otherwise, you get nothing. Because the privileges The Limitations of Applying the Stored Communications Act to Social Media
Victoria M. Allen*
The advent of social media has increasingly affected how people live and communicate. Millions of Americans use social media every day, and the numbers continue to grow. The motivation to post on social media is multifactorial and includes a desire to stay connected, find others with shared interests, change opinions, and encourage action, but posting Battle of the Opinions: Conflicting Interpretations of False Opinions and the Falsity Standard Under the False Claims Act
Thitipong Mongkolrattanothai*
Congress has let loose a posse of ad hoc deputies to uncover and prosecute frauds against the government . . . . [Bad actors] may prefer the dignity of being chased only by the regular troops; if so, they must seek relief from Congress. INTRODUCTION What most people probably do not realize is that approximately ten percent of all government | Vol. 96, No. 4 (2023)
No More Time Left on the Clock: Name, Image, and Likeness as the End of the Line for Student-Athlete Compensation Under Antitrust Law
Adrianna Robakowski*
Student-athletes shall be amateurs in an intercollegiate sport, and their participation should be motivated primarily by education and by the physical, mental and social benefits to be derived. Student participation in intercollegiate athletics is an avocation, and student-athletes should be protected from exploitation by professional and commercial enterprises. – NCAA Constitution, Article II Personal Jurisdictional Limits Over Plaintiff Class Action Claims
Jonathan Remy Nash*
Commentators describe recent Supreme Court decisions as changing the law, to require courts to examine the propriety of personal jurisdiction as to all joined plaintiffs’ claims against a defendant. Nevertheless, many of those commentators argue that courts remain free to ignore unnamed plaintiff class members’ claims for personal jurisdiction purposes. After demonstrating that many lower Voting Rights in Corporate Governance: History and Political Economy
Sarah C. Haan*
Political voting rights have become the subject of sharp legal wrangling in American political elections and the focus of headlines and popular debate. Less attention has focused on American corporate elections, where something similar has been happening: the last two decades have witnessed significant unsettling of basic shareholder voting rights, including laws and practices that Inflation, Market Failures, and Algorithms
Rory Van Loo*
Inflation is a problem of tremendous scale. But the leading response to inflation—raising interest rates—also poses economic risks. Raising interest rates rapidly may increase unemployment and heighten the chance of recession. This Article argues that there is a better way to think about anti-inflation policy. Rather than defaulting to interest rate hikes that harm markets, Delegating War Powers
Michael D. Ramsey* & Matthew C. Waxman†
Academic scholarship and political commentary endlessly debate the President’s independent constitutional power to start wars. And yet, every major U.S. war in the last sixty years was fought pursuant to war-initiation power that Congress gave to the President in the form of authorizations for the use of military force. As a practical matter, the central | |
| Vol. 96, No. 6 (2023)
Regulation by Enforcement
Chris Brummer,* Yesha Yadav† & David Zaring‡
An increasingly common response by regulators to what they view as undesirable market trends or challenges has been a sharp turn toward litigation to introduce novel legal theories and frameworks that could have been the product or subject of legislative or administrative rulemaking. The decision to do so has been met by calls claiming such Adventure Capital
Elizabeth Pollman*
This symposium Article traces the history and rise of venture capital and venture-backed startups in the United States from a business law perspective and explores the current big questions in the field. This examination highlights that after lawmakers shaped the enabling environment for venture capital to flourish, corporate and securities law has responded to the Technology, Markets, and the Income Tax Frontier
Andrew T. Hayashi*
Income tax law and policy are fundamentally intertwined with private markets—causal effects run in both directions. The vitality of public markets can be stifled or invigorated by the way that they are taxed. The power to tax is the power to destroy. In turn, the computation and collection of income taxes depends upon the valuation The Meme Stock Frenzy: Origins and Implications
Dhruv Aggarwal,* Albert H. Choi† & Yoon-Ho Alex Lee‡
In 2021, several publicly traded companies, such as GameStop, Bed Bath & Beyond, and AMC, became “meme stocks,” experiencing a sharp rise in their stock prices through a dramatic influx of retail investors into their shareholder base. Analyses of the meme stock surge and its implications for corporate governance have focused on the idiosyncratic creation What’s in a Name? ESG Mutual Funds and the SEC’s Names Rule
Jill E. Fisch* & Adriana Z. Robertson†
As investor money flows into environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) mutual funds, regulators have raised growing concerns about greenwashing—specifically that a fund’s name will falsely suggest that the fund invests in companies that meet certain ESG standards. To address these concerns, the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed amendments to the Investment Company Act (“Names AI-Generated Inventions: Implications for the Patent System
Gaétan de Rassenfosse,* Adam B. Jaffe† & Melissa Wasserman‡
In 2021, several publicly traded companies, such as GameStop, Bed Bath & Beyond, and AMC, became “meme stocks,” experiencing a sharp rise in their stock prices through a dramatic influx of retail investors into their shareholder base. Analyses of the meme stock surge and its implications for corporate governance have focused on the idiosyncratic creation The Bankruptcy Court as Crypto Market Regulator
Yesha Yadav* & Robert J. Stark†
In the second half of 2022, several large and systemically important cryptocurrency firms, such as BlockFi, Celsius, FTX, and Voyager, collapsed into bankruptcy. Their sudden implosion can be attributed, at least in part, to a scant pre-existing framework for oversight, allowing firms to engage in runaway risk-taking, exuberant opportunism, and, in some cases, outright fraud. Data Valuation and Law
Jordan Barry* & D. Daniel Sokol†
Data has become an increasingly valuable asset. Numerous areas of law—including contracts, corporate law, intellectual property (“IP”), antitrust, tax, privacy, and bankruptcy—require parties and courts to determine the value of assets, including data. Unfortunately, data valuation has been hindered by a lack of clarity over what data is and why it is valuable. This lack Secondary Trading Crypto Fraud and the Propriety of Securities Class Actions
Menesh S. Patel*
Traders participating in secondary crypto asset markets risk significant loss. Some trading loss will arise simply because of market dynamics, including inherently volatile crypto asset prices. But secondary crypto asset traders also risk considerable monetary injury resulting from fraudulent statements or acts by crypto asset sponsors or others occurring in connection with their secondary transactions. |
Vol. 95, No. 1 (2021)
Democracy Dies in Silicon Valley: Platform Antitrust and the Journalism Industry
Erick Franklund*
Newspapers are classic examples of platforms. They are intermediaries between, and typically require participation from, two distinct groups: on the one hand, there are patrons eager to read the latest scoop; on the other hand, there are advertisers offering their goods and services on the outer edges of the paper in hopes of soliciting sales. Life Story Rights Litigation: Negotiating for a Happy Ending
Kendall Ota*
Filmmakers, television writers, and authors alike have made millions of dollars in the entertainment industry by telling stories that have already been lived by real people. Not only do these creative works force enormous public exposure upon the real people portrayed, but they often portray these real-life inspirations in inaccurate, or even harmful ways. Furthermore, Taxing Guns
Thomas Griffith*, Nancy Staudt†
Policymakers across the nation have recently adopted new taxes on guns. As expected, these policies are controversial. Supporters believe the taxes will increase the cost of weapons, decrease sales, and provide the revenue necessary to fund the costs of gun violence across America. Critics, by contrast, argue the taxes are nothing more than poll taxes Transgender Rights & the Eighth Amendment
Jennifer L. Levi*, Kevin M. Barry†
The past decades have witnessed a dramatic shift in the visibility, acceptance, and integration of transgender people across all aspects of culture and the law. The treatment of incarcerated transgender people is no exception. Historically, transgender people have been routinely denied access to medically necessary hormone therapy, surgery, and other gender-affirming procedures; subjected to cross-gender Designing Supreme Court Term Limits
Adam Chilton*, Daniel Epps†, Kyle Rozema‡ & Maya Sen††
Since the Founding, Supreme Court Justices have enjoyed life tenure. This helps insulate the Justices from political pressures, but it also results in unpredictable deaths and strategic retirements determining the timing of Court vacancies. In order to regularize the appointments process, a number of academics and policymakers have put forward detailed term-limits proposals. However, many | Vol. 95, No. 2 (2022)
Voting and Campaign Financing: Inconsistencies in Law and Policy
Pablo Aabir Das*
The right to vote in elections and the right to spend[1] in elections are both historicallyrevered rights that function as critical elements of American democracy.[2]These rights have earned their salience because they are two of the most commonand accessible mechanisms by which Americans can participate in the democraticprocess. In different ways, each right enables citizens to Labor’s New Localism
Andrew Elmore*
Millions of workers in the United States, disproportionately women, immigrants, and people of color, perform low-paid, precarious work. Few of these workers can improve their workplace standards because the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) does not sufficiently protect their right to form unions and collectively bargain. Lacking sufficient influence in federal and state government to Detention, Disenfranchisement, and Doctrinal Integration
Zina Makar*
On any given day, approximately 2.3 million individuals are incarcerated, many of whom are eligible voters and are disproportionately people of color.[1] The majority of state and local governments do not affirmatively provide incarcerated voters with special accommodations to ensure that they are able to exercise their right to vote, leaving many effectively disenfranchised. What Closing International Law’s Innocence Gap
Brandon L. Garrett*, Laurence R. Helfer†, Jayne C. Huckerby‡
Over the last decade, a growing number of countries have adopted new laws and other mechanisms to address a gap in national criminal legal systems: the absence of meaningful procedures to raise post-conviction claims of factual innocence. These legal and policy reforms have responded to a global surge of exonerations facilitated by the growth of Small Fines and Fees, Large Impacts: Ability-to-Pay Hearings
Tia Kerkhof*
Imagine, for example, that a woman fails to have auto insurance,[1] which carries a minimum fine of $500 in Massachusetts.[2] In addition, she will be charged a $500 payment or one full year premium of compulsory insurance (whichever is larger), a $45 late fee and a $25 filing fee if she chooses to request a |
Vol. 95, No. 3 (2022)
Overturning Override: Why Executing a Person Sentenced to Death By Judicial Override Violates the Eighth Amendment
Meghann M. Lamb*
INTRODUCTION Judicial override is a practice by which a judge overrules a sentence decided by a jury. Perhaps the most alarming, infamous, and controversial form of judicial override occurs when a judge overrules a jury’s recommendation for life imprisonment and replaces it with the death penalty. The use of judicial override in capital punishment cases Crack Taxes and The Dangers of Insidious Regulatory Taxes
Hayes R. Holderness*
An unheralded weapon in the War on Drugs can be found in state tax codes: many states impose targeted taxes on individuals for the possession and sale of controlled substances. These “crack taxes” provide state officials with a powerful means of sanctioning individuals without providing those individuals the protections of the criminal law. Further, these The Role of State Attorneys General In Improving Prescription Drug Affordability
MICHELLE M. MELLO,* TRISH RILEY† & RACHEL E. SACHS‡
Impact litigation initiated by state attorneys general has played an important role in advancing public health goals in contexts as diverse as tobacco control, opioids, and healthcare antitrust. State attorneys general also play a critical role in helping governors and legislatures advance health policies by giving input into their drafting and defending them against legal Provisional Assumptions
Heidi H. Liu*
In courtrooms, the law often asks individuals to ignore information—carefully, purposely—that otherwise feels important. Juries, for example, are often asked to disregard information about a variety of facts, from prior convictions to settlement negotiations. But legal literature and psychology research has shown us that it is difficult for jurors to follow these instructions and cabin A Closer Look at the PTAB Operation
Ge You*
Prior to the passage of the America Invents Act (“AIA”) in 2011,[1] allegedly low-quality patents were allowed to proliferate. Many of these low-quality patents contributed little to innovation because holders of these patents did not practice the technologies they had exclusive rights over. Rather, these patent holders used the patents to challenge actually productive patents | Vol. 95, No. 4 (2022)
Divided Agencies
Brian D. Feinstein* & Abby K. Wood†
Clashes between presidential appointees and civil servants are front-page news. Whether styled as a “deep state” hostile to its democratically selected political principals or as bold “resisters” countering those principals’ ultra vires proposals, accounts of civil servant opposition are legion. Move beyond headlines, however, and little is known about the impact of political divisions within The Social Context of the Law: A Critical Analysis of Reliance Interests in the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
Raquel Muñiz,* Maria Lewis,† Grace Cavanaugh‡ & Melissa Woolsey††
In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California case. The case concerned the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) policy, an issue that sparked the interest of a wide range of amicus curiae, including those in support of the policy. Using Dimensional Disparate Treatment
Benjamin Eidelson*
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County was an important victory for gay and transgender workers—but the Court’s textual analysis has failed to persuade a number of thoughtful commentators, and it threatens to leave anti-discrimination law in disarray. The root of the problem is that Bostock trumpeted a “simple test” of but-for causation Say Yes to Her Redress: A Two-Step Approach to Post-Divorce Embryo Disputes
Gabrielle Lipsitz*
INTRODUCTION I can’t believe Taylor Swift is about to turn 30 – she still looks so young! It’s strange to think that 90% of her eggs are already gone – 97% by the time she turns 40 – so I hope she thinks about having kids before it’s too late! She’d be a fun mom. Without Exception? The Ninth Circuit’s Evolving Stance on Nondebtor Releases in Chapter 11 Reorganizations
Caleb Downs*
INTRODUCTION Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (or the “Code”) allows a troubled business debtor the opportunity to restructure its financial affairs so that it may successfully operate in the future.[1] To facilitate this process, a Chapter 11 debtor is given the exclusive right to propose a reorganization plan that, among other things, “provides for |
Vol. 95, No. 5 (2022)
The Rise of Bankruptcy Directors
Jared A. Ellias, * Ehud Kamar† & Kobi Kastiel‡
In this Article, we use hand-collected data to shed light on a troubling development in bankruptcy practice: distressed companies, especially those controlled by private equity sponsors, often now prepare for a Chapter 11 filing by appointing bankruptcy experts to their boards of directors and giving them the board’s power to make key bankruptcy decisions. These Cannon Fodder, or a Soldier’s Right to Life
Saira Mohamed*
In recent years, hundreds of American service members have died in training exercises and routine non-combat operations, aboard American warships, tactical vehicles, and fighter planes. They have died in incidents that military investigations and congressional hearings and journalists deem preventable, incidents stemming from the U.S. government delaying maintenance of deteriorating equipment or staffing vessels with Colorblind Constitutional Torts
Osagie K. Obasogie* & Zachary Newman†
Much of the recent conversation regarding law and police accountability has focused on eliminating or limiting qualified immunity as a defense for officers facing § 1983 lawsuits for using excessive force. Developed during Reconstruction as a way to protect formerly enslaved persons from new forms of racial terror, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 allows private individuals to bring Who’s on the Hook for Digital Piracy? Analysis of Proposed Changes to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Secondary Copyright Infringement Claims
Erika Pang
FBI Anti-Piracy Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to five years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.[1] Chances are that many Americans have seen the warning above at some The Agency Problem in SPACs: A Legal Analysis of SPAC IPO Investor Protections
Tyler J. Martin
The events that occurred in 2020 drastically altered the world’s financial markets,[1] contributing to an increase in Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”) of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”).[2] In particular, 2020 was a year marked by numerous records within the SPAC market, including the highest number of SPAC IPOs (248), the highest amount of proceeds raised | Vol. 95, No. 6 (2022)
Justice Breyer’s Friendly Legacy for Environmental Law
Richard J. Lazarus*
Environmentalists did not cheer President Bill Clinton’s decision in May 1994 to nominate then-First Circuit Judge Stephen Breyer to fill Justice Harry Blackmun’s seat on the Supreme Court. Just the opposite. Many instead expressed serious concerns about Breyer’s impact on environmental law were he to be confirmed, and openly questioned whether a Justice Breyer might Should Humanity Have Standing? Securing Environmental Rights in the United States
Daniel C. Esty*
While courts around the world are increasingly recognizing rights of nature or the rights of individuals or communities to a safe and healthy environment, American courts have been much more skeptical of environmental rights claims. This Article examines this growing divergence and identifies trends in American law that might account for it, including explanations deeply Standing for Rivers, Mountains—and Trees—in the Anthropocene
David Takacs*
In his well-known article, Should Trees Have Standing?—Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, Professor Christopher Stone proposed that courts grant nonhuman entities standing as plaintiffs so their interests may directly represented in court. In this Article, I review Stone’s ideas about standing and our relationship with the natural environment and describe the current, burgeoning, widespread Fish, Whales, and a Blue Ethics for the Anthropocene: How Do We Think About the Last Wild Food in the Twenty-First Century
Robin Kundis Craig*
One of the lesser celebrated threads of Christopher Stone’s scholarship was his interest in the ocean—especially international fisheries and whaling. Fish and whales are among the “last wild food”—that is, species that humans take directly from the wild for food purposes. While whales are primarily cultural food, fisheries remain important contributors to the human diet Identifying Contemporary Rights of Nature in the United States
Karen Bradshaw*
The Rights of Nature movement is at the precipice of watershed social changes. Leaders of this international, Indigenous-led movement call upon the public to radically reimagine the human relationship with nature. This Article comes at a crucial moment when some leading environmental law scholars are questioning the potential Rights of Nature within the United States. |
The Rehnquist Court, Structural Due Process, and Semisubstantive Constitutional Review
Article by Dan T. Coenen
Using Legal Process to Fight Terrorism: Detentions, Military Commissions, International Tribunals, and the Rule of Law
Article by Laura A. Dickinson
A Haven for Hate: The Foreign and Domestic Implications of Protecting Internet Hate Speech Under the First Amendment
Note by Peter J. Breckheimer
Equality in the Workplace: Why Family Leave Does Not Work
Note by Erin Gielow